The Ruling All Progressives Congress in Kwara State, has rejected the judgement of the state Home of Meeting Elections Petition Tribunal, which nullified the election of its candidate, Ahmed Adam representing Patigi constituency within the state Meeting.
The tribunal on Monday, nullified the election of Adam over alleged irregularities in his names, and declared the PDP candidate, Salihu Yahaya Mohammed as winner of the bye election.
Delivering the judgement, the Chairman of the tribunal, Aminat Aliyu, stated ” Adam’s identify on the EC9 type is totally different from the one on his major college certificates, declaration of age, voter card and within the letter forwarded to the INEC on 15th January, 2019.”
Nevertheless, in a response, the state Publicity Secretary of the APC, Folaranmi Aro, in an announcement in Ilorin, stated, ” The judgement was primarily based on the distinction between ‘Adam’ and ‘Adama’ on the certificates of the candidate of the APC, although the PDP by no means referred to as any witness from the examination physique to substantiate its declare, that the APC candidate was not the proprietor of the certificates tendered for his election.”
He stated, “The tribunal didn’t deny that we received the election overwhelmingly.
“It as an alternative hid below a feeble excuse that the names of our candidate on the 2 certificates he offered to the electoral physique, are barely totally different from one another to award our mandate to the opposition.
“It’s a unhappy day for democracy, because the judgement is a slap on the hundreds of the citizens who stood within the solar to make their alternative,” the social gathering added.
It described the judgement as “a violent assault on the place of the Supreme Courtroom in lots of established instances the place an alphabet was both omitted or added to a candidate’s identify.”
Asserting that the social gathering will enchantment the judgement, as a result of it alerts a hazard for Nigeria’s democracy and stealing the mandate of the individuals, the social gathering’s spokesman, stated, “The judgement is a judicial subversion of the mandate of the individuals.”